北京地区中国荷斯坦牛体细胞评分差值变化规律及遗传力估计

doi:10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2018.05.008

畜牧兽医学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5): 935-941.doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2018.05.008

北京地区中国荷斯坦牛体细胞评分差值变化规律及遗传力估计

史良玉¹, 张瑞强¹, 李想¹, Serafino Musa Abdelkarim Augustino¹, Muhammad Zahoor Khan¹, 刘林², 肖炜³, 唐韶青³, 张毅¹, 王雅春¹, 俞英^1*

1. 中国农业大学动物科技学院, 北京 100193;
2. 北京市奶牛中心, 北京 100085;
3. 北京市畜牧总站, 北京 100029

收稿日期:2017-11-27 出版日期:2018-05-23 发布日期:2018-05-23
通讯作者: 俞英,副教授,博士生导师,主要从事动物抗病育种与表观遗传研究,E-mail:yuying@cau.edu.cn
作者简介:史良玉(1994-),女,吉林白山人,硕士生,主要从事动物分子数量遗传学研究,E-mail:18643954380@163.com
基金资助:
国家奶牛产业技术体系项目（CARS-36）；北京市奶牛产业创新团队（BAIC06）；北京市自然科学基金（6182021）；国家自然科学基金（31272420）；长江学者与创新团队发展计划（IRT1191）

Heritability Estimation of SCS Difference and Its Variation in Chinese Holstein Cattle in Beijing

SHI Liang-yu¹, ZHANG Rui-qiang¹, LI Xiang¹, Serafino Musa Abdelkarim Augustino¹, Muhammad Zahoor Khan¹, LIU Lin², XIAO Wei³, TANG Shao-qing³, ZHANG Yi¹, WANG Ya-chun¹, YU Ying^1*

1. College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China;
2. Beijing Dairy Center, Beijing 100085, China;
3. Beijing Animal Husbandry Station, Beijing 100029, China

Received:2017-11-27 Online:2018-05-23 Published:2018-05-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

旨在对北京地区中国荷斯坦牛体细胞评分（SCS）差值变化规律进行探索以及遗传力估计。本研究通过对相邻两个泌乳月SCS差值的计算，利用最小二乘法对北京地区1998-2016年间121个牛场中78 386头中国荷斯坦奶牛DHI数据进行分析，并利用DMU软件和线性混合模型估计SCS差值各方差组分，计算其遗传力。结果表明，场规模、当前测定年、当前测定季节、胎次、产犊季节、当前泌乳月对SCS差值具有极显著性影响（P<0.01）； SCS差值遗传力为（0.054±0.003）。其中，一胎、二胎、三胎SCS差值遗传力分别为（0.070±0.005）、（0.045±0.004）、（0.052±0.007）。结果表明，SCS差值作为一种实时简易检测隐性乳房炎发生的指标，其遗传力的估计在中国荷斯坦牛抗隐性乳房炎选择中具有重要作用。

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to investigate the heritability of somatic cell score (SCS) difference and analyze its changing pattern in Chinese Holstein population in Beijing. Dairy herd improvement (DHI) data of 78 386 Chinese Holstein dairy cows (from 1998 to 2016) obtained from 121 different dairy farms in Beijing were analyzed by the least square method and the SCS difference was calculated using DHI data between the SCSs of the current test-month and the previous test-month. The variance components and heritability of SCS difference were estimated by the linear mixed model and DMU software. The results revealed significant effect (P<0.01) of herd scale, test year, test season, parity, calving season and current lactation month on SCS difference. The estimated heritability of SCS difference in the current study was (0.054±0.003) for Chinese Holstein cows in Beijing. Among them, the heritability of SCS difference in the first, the second and the third parities were (0.070±0.005),(0.045±0.004), (0.052±0.007), respectively. Since the SCS difference is regarded as a timely simply indicator to detect the occurrence of subclinical mastitis, the estimated heritability of SCS difference might be helpful in the selection practice of resistance to subclinical mastitis in Chinese Holstein cattle.

中图分类号:

S823
S813.1

史良玉, 张瑞强, 李想, Serafino Musa Abdelkarim Augustino, Muhammad Zahoor Khan, 刘林, 肖炜, 唐韶青, 张毅, 王雅春, 俞英. 北京地区中国荷斯坦牛体细胞评分差值变化规律及遗传力估计[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2018, 49(5): 935-941.

SHI Liang-yu, ZHANG Rui-qiang, LI Xiang, Serafino Musa Abdelkarim Augustino, Muhammad Zahoor Khan, LIU Lin, XIAO Wei, TANG Shao-qing, ZHANG Yi, WANG Ya-chun, YU Ying. Heritability Estimation of SCS Difference and Its Variation in Chinese Holstein Cattle in Beijing[J]. ACTA VETERINARIA ET ZOOTECHNICA SINICA, 2018, 49(5): 935-941.

参考文献

[1] HALASA T,HUIJPS K,ØSTERÅS O,et al.Economic effects of bovine mastitis and mastitis management:a review[J].Vet Quart,2007,29(1):18-31.
[2] HERINGSTAD B,KLEMETSDAL G,RUANE J.Selection for mastitis resistance in dairy cattle:a review with focus on the situation in the Nordic countries[J].Livestock Prod Sci,2000,64(2-3):95-106.
[3] BAKKEN G,GUDDING R.The interdependence between clinical and subclinical mastitis[J].Acta Agric Scandinav,1982,32(1):17-22.
[4] BEAUDEAU F,FOURICHON C,SEEGERS H,et al.Risk of clinical mastitis in dairy herds with a high proportion of low individual milk somatic-cell counts[J].Prev Vet Med,2002,53(1-2):43-54.
[5] LARRY S K,TODHUNTER D A,SCHOENBERGER P S.Environmental pathogens and intramammary infection during the dry period[J].J Dairy Sci,1985,68(2):402-417.
[6] VAARST M,ENEVOLDSEN C.Patterns of clinical mastitis manifestations in Danish organic dairy herds[J].J Dairy Res,1997,64(1):23-37.
[7] DE HAAS Y,VEERKAMP R F,BARKEMA H W,et al.Associations between pathogen-specific cases of clinical mastitis and somatic cell count patterns[J].J Dairy Sci,2004,87(1):95-105.
[8] DE HAAS Y,BARKEMA H W,VEERKAMP R F.The effect of pathogen-specific clinical mastitis on the lactation curve for somatic cell count[J].J Dairy Sci,2002,85(5):1314-1323.
[9] HARMON R J.Physiology of mastitis and factors affecting somatic cell counts[J].J Dairy Sci,1994,77(7):2103-2112.
[10] DOHOO I R,MEEK A H,MARTIN S W.Somatic cell counts in bovine milk:relationships to production and clinical episodes of mastitis[J].Can J Comp Med,1984,48(2):130-135.
[11] ZWERTVAEGHER I,DE VLIEGHER S,VERBIST B,et al.Short communication:Associations between teat dimensions and milking-induced changes in teat dimensions and quarter milk somatic cell counts in dairy cows[J].J Dairy Sci,2013,96(2):1075-1080.
[12] 冯文,王晓,王雅春,等.内蒙古三河牛体细胞数与产奶量的关系[C]//中国新疆昌吉第八届中国牛业发展大会.呼图壁:中国畜牧业协会,2013:5.
FENG W,WANG X,WANG Y C,et al.Relationship between somatic cell number and milk production in Sanhe,Inner[C]//Eighth China Cattle Industry Development Conference,Changji,Xinjiang,China.Hutubi:China Animal Agriculture Association,2013:5.(in Chinese)
[13] 钱梦樱,乔婕,王晓,等.使用SCC差值法分析北方牛场中国荷斯坦牛生产状况[J].中国奶牛,2015(13):18-22.
QIAN M Y,QIAO J,WANG X,et al.Using SCC difference ranking method to analyze the production status of China Holstein from northern part of China[J].China Dairy Cattle,2015(13):18-22.(in Chinese)
[14] SANTMAN-BERENDS I M G A,OLDE RIEKERINK R G M,SAMPIMON O C,et al.Incidence of subclinical mastitis in Dutch dairy heifers in the first 100 days in lactation and associated risk factors[J].J Dairy Sci,2012,95(5):2476-2484.
[15] DE VLIEGHER S,BARKEMA H W,STRYHN H,et al.Impact of early lactation somatic cell count in heifers on milk yield over the first lactation[J].J Dairy Sci,2005,88(3):938-947.
[16] DE VLIEGHER S,LAEVENS H,BARKEMA H W,et al.Management practices and heifer characteristics associated with early lactation somatic cell count of Belgian dairy heifers[J].J Dairy Sci,2004,87(4):937-947.
[17] WIGGANS G R,SHOOK G E.A lactation measure of somatic cell count[J].J Dairy Sci,1987,70(12):2666-2672.
[18] 郭刚.中国荷斯坦牛体细胞评分(SCS)性状的遗传分析[D].北京:中国农业大学,2007.
GUO G.Genetic analysis of somatic cell score in Chinese Holstein Population[D].Beijing:China Agriculture University,2007.(in Chinese)
[19] 曹斌斌,叶耿坪,刘光磊,等.利用DHI数据分析规模化牧场牛群乳房健康状况[J].中国奶牛,2016(8):17-21.
CAO B B,YE G P,LIU G L,et al.Study on the evaluation of udder healthy using DHI data[J].China Dairy Cattle,2016(8):17-21.(in Chinese)
[20] SKRZYPEK R,WÓJTOWSKI J,FAHR R D.Factors affecting somatic cell count in cow bulk tank milk-a case study from Poland[J].J Vet Med A,2004,51(3):127-131.
[21] SHELDRAKE R F,HOARE R J T,MCGREGOR G D.Lactation stage,parity,and infection affecting somatic cells,electrical conductivity,and serum albumin in milk[J].J Dairy Sci,1983,66(3):542-547.
[22] 李世平,毛永江,常洪,等.南方地区中国荷斯坦牛乳中体细胞数变化规律的研究[J].中国畜牧杂志,2008(3):7-9.
LI S P,MAO Y J,CHANG H,et al.Study on variability of somatic cell counts in the milk of Chinese Holstein cattle in South China[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Science,2008(3):7-9.(in Chinese)
[23] SHARMA N,SINGH N K,BHADWAL M S.Relationship of somatic cell count and mastitis:an overview[J].Asian Austral J Anim Sci,2011,24(3):429-438.
[24] 甘宗辉,杨章平,李云龙,等.奶牛乳房炎的细菌感染与奶中体细胞数及乳成分的关系[J].畜牧兽医学报,2013,44(6):972-979.
GAN Z H, YANG Z P, LI Y L, et al. Relationship of bacterial infection with somatic cell count and milk composition in dairy cows with mastitis[J].Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2013,44(6):972-979.(in Chinese)
[25] 于洪江,沈泰钰,高三思,等.一胎奶牛与经产奶牛围产期血液生化指标对比研究[J].中国兽医学报,2016,36(10):1753-1757.
YU H J,SHEN T Y,GAO S S,et al.Comparative study on the blood biochemical indices of primiparous and multiparous dairy cows in perinatal stage[J].Chinese Journal of Veterinary Science,2016,36(10):1753-1757.(in Chinese)
[26] 金亚东,李艳艳,徐晓锋.胎次和泌乳阶段对奶牛体细胞数和乳损失量的影响[J].乳业科学与技术,2016,39(3):9-13.
JIN Y D,LI Y Y,XU X F.Effects of parity and lactation stage on somatic cell score and milk production loss in dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science and Technolgoy,2016,39(3):9-13.(in Chinese)
[27] 郭家中,刘小林,徐阿娟,等.奶牛体细胞评分的变化规律研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2010,38(6):67-70.
GUO J Z,LIU X L,XU A J,et al.Study on the variation of somatic cell score (SCS) in dairy cattle[J].Journal of Northwest A&F University:Natural Science Edition,2010,38(6):67-70.(in Chinese)
[28] 张佳兰,昝林森,方平.不同因素对荷斯坦牛体细胞评分的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2007,35(4):60-62.
ZHANG J L,ZAN L S,FANG P.Effect of season parity and lactation stages on SCS in different dairy farms of Chinese Holstein[J].Journal of Northwest A&F University:Natural Science Edition,2007,35(4):60-62.(in Chinese)
[29] LEE C S,WOODING F B,KEMP P.Identification,properties,and differential counts of cell populations using electron microscopy of dry cows secretions,colostrum and milk from normal cows[J].J Dairy Res,1980,47(1):39-50.
[30] BORTOLAMI A,FIORE E,GIANESELLA M,et al.Evaluation of the udder health status in subclinical mastitis affected dairy cows through bacteriological culture,somatic cell count and thermographic imaging[J].Pol J Vet Sci,2015,18(4):799-805.
[31] MORONI P,SGOIFO R C,PISONI G,et al.Relationships between somatic cell count and intramammary infection in buffaloes[J].J Dairy Sci,2006,89(3):998-1003.
[32] 王晓,俞英,冯文,等.三河牛体细胞数差值与产奶性状的关系[J].中国奶牛,2016(1):20-22.
WANG X,YU Y,FENG W,et al.Correlation between somatic cell count difference value and milk production traits[J].China Dairy Cattle,2016(1):20-22.(in Chinese)

北京地区中国荷斯坦牛体细胞评分差值变化规律及遗传力估计

Heritability Estimation of SCS Difference and Its Variation in Chinese Holstein Cattle in Beijing

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈丽丽, 赵康, 夏敏, 芦娜, 马毅. 不同出生季节对天津地区荷斯坦牛泌乳性能的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(5): 1970-1977.
[2]	屠芸, 曾雅楠, 张蒸豪, 洪瑞, 王震, 吴平, 周泽洋, 叶艺茹, 杜亚楠, 左福元, 张龚炜. 保种场涪陵水牛及西南地区水牛品种间遗传结构与ROH分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(5): 1989-1998.
[3]	杨小峰, 秦小伟, 吕丽华. MNQ的一种衍生物对LPS体外诱导的牛卵巢卵泡颗粒细胞炎性损伤的保护作用[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(5): 2032-2041.
[4]	龙唐晖, 詹彦波, 廖观香, 陈新锋, 张健, 李艳娇, 欧阳克蕙, 邱清华. 饲粮添加赖氨酸对肉牛粪便发酵参数和微生物菌群结构的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(5): 2042-2049.
[5]	修豪宇, 李迎军, 原开敏, 汪超, 杨书含, 吕丽华, 王栋. 母牛发情期间躯体不同部位温度变化规律研究进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(4): 1381-1388.
[6]	向辉, 桂林森, 杨迪, 魏士昊, 宫艳斌, 史远刚, 马云, 淡新刚. 奶牛同期发情-定时输精技术研究进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(4): 1412-1422.
[7]	王中波, 刘爽, 贺丽霞, 冯雪, 杨梦丽, 汪书哲, 刘源, 冯兰, 丁晓玲, 冀国尚, 杨润军, 张路培, 马云. 固原黄牛不同部位肌肉组织代谢组学分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(4): 1565-1578.
[8]	黄显朋, 邢嘉仪, 白媛媛, 姜雨婷, 麻志伟, 付伟, 兰道亮. 牦牛六个多能性相关转录因子OSKMNL的克隆和多顺反子慢病毒载体的构建[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(4): 1579-1591.
[9]	尚恺圆, 江明锋, 官久强, 安添午, 赵洪文, 柏琴, 吴伟生, 李华德, 谢荣清, 沙泉, 罗晓林, 张翔飞. 围产期母体营养调控对犊牦牛生长发育、血清生化及免疫功能的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(4): 1638-1648.
[10]	王潇, 张昊, 栾庆江, 李慧, 杨鼎, 王婷月, 田菁, 赵濛, 陈陆, 田如刚. 冷热应激对肉牛生理指标及基因表达影响的研究进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(3): 894-904.
[11]	沈文娟, 杨卓, 张馨蕊, 付予, 陶金忠. 奶牛生殖道微生物与繁殖及相关疾病的研究进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(3): 924-932.
[12]	徐东辉, 徐宇辉, 李瑞哲, 成海建, 马志杰. 牦牛基因组拷贝数变异研究进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(3): 933-943.
[13]	夏淑雯, 陈坤琳, 沈阳阳, 安振江, 赵芳, 丁强, 仲跻峰, 林志平, 王慧利. 江苏地区荷斯坦成母牛长寿性状遗传参数估计[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(3): 1030-1039.
[14]	虎巧燕, 翟相钦, 李一丹, 韩家乐, 雷初朝, 党瑞华. Bta-miR-101对牛睾丸支持细胞增殖、凋亡及分泌的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(3): 1040-1051.
[15]	曹晋康, 张纯, 王佳瑶, 李晓彤, 王鹏宇, 方颖妍, 张昱, 丁宁, 姜力. 中国荷斯坦公牛不同耐冻性精子的蛋白质组学分析[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2024, 55(3): 1052-1061.